Dyes v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dyes v. Friedman

27 A.D.2d 714, 279 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4945

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 714 (Dyes v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dyes v. Friedman, 27 A.D.2d 714, 279 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the Appellate Term unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs and disbursements to appellant in that court and judgment granted in favor of plaintiff, entered February 9, 1966, reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant unless plaintiff stipulates to accept $3,000 in lieu of the amount awarded by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as so modified affirmed, without costs or disbursements in this court or the Appellate Term. The verdict is obviously excessive and is not warranted on this record. Settle order on notice. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the Appellate Term unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs and disbursements to appellant in that court and judgment granted in favor of plaintiff, entered February 9, 1966, reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant unless plaintiff stipulates to accept $3,000 in lieu of the amount awarded by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as so modified affirmed, without costs or disbursements in this court or the Appellate Term. The verdict is obviously excessive and is not warranted on this record. Settle order on notice. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 714, 279 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyes-v-friedman-nyappdiv-1967.