Dyer's Executors v. Beatty
3 Md. 219
This text of 3 Md. 219 (Dyer's Executors v. Beatty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dyer's Executors v. Beatty, 3 Md. 219 (Va. Super. Ct. 1794).
Opinion
determined that the second writ of error was no Supersedeas to the ca. sa., as it was the defendant’s own fault that the first writ of error was dismissed, and permitted the plaintiff to call the execution, and on which the defendant was committed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Md. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyers-executors-v-beatty-vagensess-1794.