Dyer's Executors v. Beatty
3 Md. 219
Opinion
determined that the second writ of error was no Supersedeas to the ca. sa., as it was the defendant’s own fault that the first writ of error was dismissed, and permitted the plaintiff to call the execution, and on which the defendant was committed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dyer's Executors v. Beatty, 3 Md. 219 (Va. Super. Ct. 1794).
3 Md. 219 (Dyer's Executors v. Beatty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.