Dyer v. Union Railroad Co.
This text of 55 A. 688 (Dyer v. Union Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court is of the opinion that evidence as to the failure to ring the bell on the car in question at the intersection of other streets prior to the time of the accident was not proper. Agulino v. R. R. Co., 21 R. I. 263. But a consideration of the evidence shows that the negligence of the defendant was so clearly established that a new trial would be of no avail, since it clearly appears that’ the plaintiff was overtaken from the rear by the car of the defendant company, which was then running at a high and excessive rate of speed. And the court fails to find that the damages awarded were excessive.
Petition for new trial denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 A. 688, 25 R.I. 221, 1903 R.I. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyer-v-union-railroad-co-ri-1903.