Dyer v. State

1931 OK CR 438, 3 P.2d 919, 52 Okla. Crim. 175, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 426
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 2, 1931
DocketNo. A-8149.
StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 438 (Dyer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dyer v. State, 1931 OK CR 438, 3 P.2d 919, 52 Okla. Crim. 175, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 426 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of receiving property, knowing the same to have been stolen, and his punishment fixed at a fine of |50; from which judgment the defendant has appealed by transcript.

The only question raised by the defendant is that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the information. An information is good if it sufficiently advises the defendant of the charge against him so he can prepare for trial.

The information stated facts sufficient to advise the defendant of the charge against him, and his demurrer was properly overruled.

The case is affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK CR 438, 3 P.2d 919, 52 Okla. Crim. 175, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyer-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.