Home/Supreme Court of Colorado/Dyer v. Sluman

Dyer v. Sluman

250 P.2d 139, 126 Colo. 406, 1952 Colo. LEXIS 235
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedOctober 27, 1952
DocketNo. 16,759
StatusPublished

This text of 250 P.2d 139 (Dyer v. Sluman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dyer v. Sluman, 250 P.2d 139, 126 Colo. 406, 1952 Colo. LEXIS 235 (Colo. 1952).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.

Mr. F. Nelson Pabst, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Vernon V. Ketring, Mr. Alex B. Holland, Mr. Wilbur Rocchio, for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 P.2d 139, 126 Colo. 406, 1952 Colo. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyer-v-sluman-colo-1952.