Dyer v. Hutchins

10 S.W. 194, 87 Tenn. 198
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 5, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 10 S.W. 194 (Dyer v. Hutchins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dyer v. Hutchins, 10 S.W. 194, 87 Tenn. 198 (Tenn. 1889).

Opinion

Turney, C. J.

The Act of 1859-60, Chapter 45, Section 1, is: “ Where any dog or dogs shall kill, or in any manner damage, any sheep in this State, the owner of such dog shall be liable, upon an action for damages, to the owner of such sheep for the worth of such sheep, if killed, or for the amount of injury or damage committed upon the same by such dog.”

In this case the injury was done by two dogs belonging to different persons, who were sued jointly.

There is nothing in the statute making the wrong the joint wrong of the respective owners. Each is responsible only for the act of his own animal, and must be- sued separately therefor.

The judgment must be reversed, and the suit dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewer v. Appalachian Constructors, Inc.
65 S.E.2d 87 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1951)
Willis v. Mann Const. Co.
145 Tenn. 318 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1921)
Farley v. Crystal Coal & Coke Co.
102 S.E. 265 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1920)
Wilson v. Wilson
137 Tenn. 590 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1917)
Hessig-Ellis Drug Co. v. Stone
129 Tenn. 608 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1914)
Pulaski Anthracite Coal Co. v. Gibboney Sand Bar Co.
66 S.E. 73 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1909)
Nohre v. Wright
108 N.W. 865 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)
Anderson v. Halverson
101 N.W. 781 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
Southern Railway Co. v. Maxwell
113 Tenn. 464 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1904)
Goodbar v. City of Memphis
113 Tenn. 20 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1904)
Swain v. Tennessee Copper Co.
111 Tenn. 430 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1903)
Memphis Street Railway Co. v. State
110 Tenn. 598 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1903)
Postal Tel. Cable Co. of Utah v. Oregon S. L. R.
65 P. 735 (Utah Supreme Court, 1901)
Strawbridge v. Stern
70 N.W. 331 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 S.W. 194, 87 Tenn. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyer-v-hutchins-tenn-1889.