Dyer v. Armor Kone Elevator, Inc.

41 A.D.3d 305, 837 N.Y.S.2d 565

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul A. Victor, J), entered March 3, 2006, which granted the motion of defendants Armor Kone Elevator, Inc. and Montgomery Kone, Inc. to strike the answer of third-party defendant City of New York for failure to comply with discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly exercised its discretion in striking third-party defendant’s answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) in light of that party’s pattern of noncompliance with court orders and discovery demands over a six-year period (see Jones v Green, 34 AD3d 260 [2006]; Goldstein v CIBC World Mkts. Corp., 30 AD3d 217 [2006]; Min Yoon v Costello, 29 AD3d 407 [2006]; see also Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118 [1999]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Williams and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dyer v. Armor Kone Elevator, Inc., 41 A.D.3d 305, 837 N.Y.S.2d 565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

41 A.D.3d 305 (Dyer v. Armor Kone Elevator, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kihl v. Pfeffer
722 N.E.2d 55 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
Min Yoon v. Costello
29 A.D.3d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Goldstein v. CIBC World Markets Corp.
30 A.D.3d 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Jones v. Green
34 A.D.3d 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)