Dye v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

Fourth Circuit

Dye v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

653 F. App'x 213

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2016·No. No. 16-1236·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Dye appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action challenging the validity of a note underlying a state foreclosure proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons [214] stated by the district court. Dye v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 3:15-cv-00082-RJC, 2016 WL 427940 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Dye appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action challenging the validity of a note underlying a state foreclosure proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons [214] stated by the district court. Dye v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 3:15-cv-00082-RJC, 2016 WL 427940 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Dye v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n, 653 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

653 F. App'x 213 (Dye v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.