Dye v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dye v. State

99 S.E. 783, 24 Ga. App. 51, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 402

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 27, 1919

Docket10461

StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 783 (Dye v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dye v. State, 99 S.E. 783, 24 Ga. App. 51, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 402 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, P. J.

1. When considered in the light of the charge of the court as a whole* none of the excerpts complained of in the motion for a new trial requires a new trial.

2. The remaining special ground of the motion for a new trial was based upon statements alleged to have been made by one of the jurors before the trial of the case, showing that he was prejudiced and biased against the defendant. The evidence submitted in support of this ground was met with a counter-showing by the State, and on this issue of fact the judge was the trior, and his decision in favor of the State was authorized by the evidence adduced.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI