Dye v. State

3 S.W.3d 291, 339 Ark. 53, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 525

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 21, 1999·No. CR 99-1023·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM. motion for

Jerry S. Dye, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Ben Beland, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM. motion for

Jerry S. Dye, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Ben Beland, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Dye v. State, 3 S.W.3d 291, 339 Ark. 53, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 525 (Ark. 1999).

Pincite

3 S.W.3d 291 (Dye v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.