Dye v. M.L.M. Ltd.

531 A.2d 420, 515 Pa. 553, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 909
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 18, 1987
DocketNo. 329 Eastern District, Allocatur Docket, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 531 A.2d 420 (Dye v. M.L.M. Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dye v. M.L.M. Ltd., 531 A.2d 420, 515 Pa. 553, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 909 (Pa. 1987).

Opinion

[554]*554ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 1987, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that the petition for allowance of appeal is granted limited to the issues of whether the trial judge erred by not awarding attorney’s fees under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2310 et seq., and whether the trial judge erred by not trebling the jury’s award under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, Act of November 24, 1976, P.L. 1166, as amended, 73 P.S. § 201-1 et seq.

LARSEN, J., would have joined a general grant of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 A.2d 420, 515 Pa. 553, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dye-v-mlm-ltd-pa-1987.