Home/New York Court of Appeals/Dye v. Lincoln First Bank

Dye v. Lincoln First Bank

344 N.E.2d 57, 38 N.Y.2d 769, 381 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2373
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 4, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 344 N.E.2d 57 (Dye v. Lincoln First Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dye v. Lincoln First Bank, 344 N.E.2d 57, 38 N.Y.2d 769, 381 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2373 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Memorandum. Order affirmed, with costs, on the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Appellate Division and because the prior grant of summary judgment, the "procedural equivalent of a trial” (Falk v Goodman, 7 NY2d 87, 91), is a binding final judgment on the merits which bars a subsequent action between the same parties for the same cause of action (Eidelberg v Zellermayer, 5 AD2d 658, 662-663, affd 6 NY2d 815; see, also, Klein v Gruss & Son, 18 AD2d 1085; Riley v Southern Transp. Co., 278 App Div 605; 6 Carmody-Wait, 2d, NY Practice, § 39:39, p 492).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marano v. Mercy Hospital
241 A.D.2d 48 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)
210 B.R. 37 (S.D. New York, 1997)
Collins v. Bertram Yacht Corp.
369 N.E.2d 758 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Litz Enterprises, Inc. v. Standard Steel Industries, Inc.
57 A.D.2d 34 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 N.E.2d 57, 38 N.Y.2d 769, 381 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dye-v-lincoln-first-bank-ny-1975.