Dye v. Johnson

338 U.S. 864, 70 S. Ct. 146
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 7, 1949
DocketNo. 332
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 338 U.S. 864 (Dye v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dye v. Johnson, 338 U.S. 864, 70 S. Ct. 146 (1949).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Ex parte Hawk, 321 U. S. 114.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Ex Rel. McInery v. Shelley
524 F. Supp. 499 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
Harrah v. Leverette
271 S.E.2d 322 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1980)
United States ex rel. Bryant v. Shapp
423 F. Supp. 471 (D. Delaware, 1976)
State v. Ritter
246 N.W.2d 552 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Walker
73 Pa. D. & C.2d 378 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1974)
Sutherland v. Love
359 F. Supp. 983 (E.D. Arkansas, 1973)
Rodriguez v. McGinnis
456 F.2d 79 (Second Circuit, 1972)
A. D. Granville v. W. B. Hunt
411 F.2d 9 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Grenfell v. Gladden
405 P.2d 532 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1965)
Murray v. Burns
405 P.2d 309 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1965)
State Ex Rel. Cole v. Tahash
129 N.W.2d 903 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1964)
Grover A. Giles and J. J. Ferrin v. Helen Merrill
322 F.2d 786 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)
In Re Riddle
372 P.2d 304 (California Supreme Court, 1962)
In re Brabson
167 F. Supp. 619 (S.D. New York, 1958)
People ex rel. Reid v. Ruthazer
4 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Sweeney v. Woodall
344 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 U.S. 864, 70 S. Ct. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dye-v-johnson-scotus-1949.