Dye v. Dye
This text of 602 P.2d 182 (Dye v. Dye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The district court dismissed an action to recover child support payments which had accrued under a divorce decree entered January 20, 1964. The dismissal was based on the court’s belief that an earlier refusal of the court to grant a post-divorce decree motion to reduce child support arrearages to judgment barred the instant action. This was error. Brown v. Vonsild, 91 Nev. 646, 541 P.2d 528 (1975); Folks v. Folks, 77 Nev. 45, 359 P.2d 92 (1961).
We reverse and remand for trial upon the issues raised by the pleadings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
602 P.2d 182, 95 Nev. 761, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dye-v-dye-nev-1979.