Dye v. Dye
602 P.2d 182, 95 Nev. 761, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 650
Opinion
OPINION
The district court dismissed an action to recover child support payments which had accrued under a divorce decree entered January 20, 1964. The dismissal was based on the court’s belief that an earlier refusal of the court to grant a post-divorce decree motion to reduce child support arrearages to judgment barred the instant action. This was error. Brown v. Vonsild, 91 Nev. 646, 541 P.2d 528 (1975); Folks v. Folks, 77 Nev. 45, 359 P.2d 92 (1961).
We reverse and remand for trial upon the issues raised by the pleadings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dye v. Dye, 602 P.2d 182, 95 Nev. 761, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 650 (Neb. 1979).
602 P.2d 182 (Dye v. Dye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Vonsild
541 P.2d 528 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1975)
Folks v. Folks
359 P.2d 92 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1961)