Dye v. Dye

602 P.2d 182, 95 Nev. 761, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 650
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 9, 1979
DocketNo. 10232
StatusPublished

This text of 602 P.2d 182 (Dye v. Dye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dye v. Dye, 602 P.2d 182, 95 Nev. 761, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 650 (Neb. 1979).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The district court dismissed an action to recover child support payments which had accrued under a divorce decree entered January 20, 1964. The dismissal was based on the court’s belief that an earlier refusal of the court to grant a post-divorce decree motion to reduce child support arrearages to judgment barred the instant action. This was error. Brown v. Vonsild, 91 Nev. 646, 541 P.2d 528 (1975); Folks v. Folks, 77 Nev. 45, 359 P.2d 92 (1961).

We reverse and remand for trial upon the issues raised by the pleadings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Vonsild
541 P.2d 528 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1975)
Folks v. Folks
359 P.2d 92 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 P.2d 182, 95 Nev. 761, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dye-v-dye-nev-1979.