Dye v. Bernier

104 A.D.3d 1102, 961 N.Y.S.2d 814
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 28, 2013·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

— McCarthy, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Lambert, J.), entered February 2, 2012, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for custody of the parties’ child.

In February 2012, Family Court granted petitioner’s application for sole custody of the parties’ child. Respondent appealed. Respondent subsequently filed a petition seeking custody. In November 2012, the court, upon the parties’ consent, granted respondent sole custody. This subsequent order, which provides respondent with all the relief she seeks and supercedes the order being appealed, renders the appeal moot (see Matter of Rolston v Decker, 94 AD3d 1264, 1264 [2012]; Matter of Dickerson v Knox, 89 AD3d 1290, 1291 [2011]; Matter of Stalker v Stalker, 88 AD3d 1177, 1178 [2011]).

Mercure, J.E, Rose and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dye v. Bernier, 104 A.D.3d 1102, 961 N.Y.S.2d 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

104 A.D.3d 1102 (Dye v. Bernier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehmann v. EDM Lenox, LLC
2020 NY Slip Op 06858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Angel RR.
145 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING v. AFFRONTI, JOHN FRANK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP v. Affronti
124 A.D.3d 1225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
DEERING, LEE-ANN v. STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Deering v. State
111 A.D.3d 1368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)