Dye v. Bernier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dye v. Bernier

104 A.D.3d 1102, 961 N.Y.S.2d 814

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 104 A.D.3d 1102 (Dye v. Bernier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dye v. Bernier, 104 A.D.3d 1102, 961 N.Y.S.2d 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— McCarthy, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Lambert, J.), entered February 2, 2012, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for custody of the parties’ child.

In February 2012, Family Court granted petitioner’s application for sole custody of the parties’ child. Respondent appealed. Respondent subsequently filed a petition seeking custody. In November 2012, the court, upon the parties’ consent, granted respondent sole custody. This subsequent order, which provides respondent with all the relief she seeks and supercedes the order being appealed, renders the appeal moot (see Matter of Rolston v Decker, 94 AD3d 1264, 1264 [2012]; Matter of Dickerson v Knox, 89 AD3d 1290, 1291 [2011]; Matter of Stalker v Stalker, 88 AD3d 1177, 1178 [2011]).

Mercure, J.E, Rose and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— McCarthy, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Lambert, J.), entered February 2, 2012, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for custody of the parties’ child.

In February 2012, Family Court granted petitioner’s application for sole custody of the parties’ child. Respondent appealed. Respondent subsequently filed a petition seeking custody. In November 2012, the court, upon the parties’ consent, granted respondent sole custody. This subsequent order, which provides respondent with all the relief she seeks and supercedes the order being appealed, renders the appeal moot (see Matter of Rolston v Decker, 94 AD3d 1264, 1264 [2012]; Matter of Dickerson v Knox, 89 AD3d 1290, 1291 [2011]; Matter of Stalker v Stalker, 88 AD3d 1177, 1178 [2011]).

Mercure, J.E, Rose and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.3d 1102, 961 N.Y.S.2d 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dye-v-bernier-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack