Dye v. Alvis

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 97
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1959
DocketNo. 36032
StatusPublished

This text of 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 97 (Dye v. Alvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dye v. Alvis, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 97 (Ohio 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offense with which he was charged. [98]*98Petitioner had and exercised the adequate remedy of appeal (appeal dismissed, 167 Ohio St., 176, 146 N. E. [2d], 604, certiorari denied, 358 U. S., 45, 3 L. Ed. [2d], 44, 79 S. Ct., 37) from the judgment of conviction to review alleged errors and cannot now have another review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. Chapman v. Alvis, Warden, 169 Ohio St., 359, 159 N. E. (2d), 453.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dye-v-alvis-ohio-1959.