Dye v. Alvis
This text of 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 97 (Dye v. Alvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offense with which he was charged. [98]*98Petitioner had and exercised the adequate remedy of appeal (appeal dismissed, 167 Ohio St., 176, 146 N. E. [2d], 604, certiorari denied, 358 U. S., 45, 3 L. Ed. [2d], 44, 79 S. Ct., 37) from the judgment of conviction to review alleged errors and cannot now have another review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. Chapman v. Alvis, Warden, 169 Ohio St., 359, 159 N. E. (2d), 453.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dye-v-alvis-ohio-1959.