Dycus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dycus v. State

629 So. 2d 275, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12338, 1993 WL 523854

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 1993

DocketNo. 93-00509

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 629 So. 2d 275 (Dycus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dycus v. State, 629 So. 2d 275, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12338, 1993 WL 523854 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

The trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion to suppress evidence; therefore, we affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. However, we strike special conditions of probation numbers (4) and (7) because they were not orally announced at sentencing and the appellant had no opportunity to object to their [276]*276imposition. See Gregory v. State, 616 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

HALL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THREADGILL, Judge.

The trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion to suppress evidence; therefore, we affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. However, we strike special conditions of probation numbers (4) and (7) because they were not orally announced at sentencing and the appellant had no opportunity to object to their [276]*276imposition. See Gregory v. State, 616 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

HALL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

629 So. 2d 275, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12338, 1993 WL 523854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dycus-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack