Dyckman v. Eisner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dyckman v. Eisner

182 A.D.2d 420

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1992·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered November 15, 1991, which, denied defendant Eisner’s motion to vacate his default in answering, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant’s present attempt to show that the IAS court had overlooked relevant facts in its prior order, from which no appeal was taken, is untimely (CPLR 2221; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568). In any event, defendant has presented neither a meritorious defense nor a reasonable excuse for the default in timely serving an answer (DFI Communications v Golden Penn Theatre Ticket Serv., 87 AD2d 778). Concur — Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered November 15, 1991, which, denied defendant Eisner’s motion to vacate his default in answering, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant’s present attempt to show that the IAS court had overlooked relevant facts in its prior order, from which no appeal was taken, is untimely (CPLR 2221; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568). In any event, defendant has presented neither a meritorious defense nor a reasonable excuse for the default in timely serving an answer (DFI Communications v Golden Penn Theatre Ticket Serv., 87 AD2d 778). Concur — Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.

Dyckman v. Eisner, 182 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

182 A.D.2d 420 (Dyckman v. Eisner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related