Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Stavola

198 So. 3d 1131, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12801, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1964
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 2016·No. No. 4D15-4057·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. McKenna, No. 4D15-3571, 198 So.3d 1038, 2016 WL 4262111 (Fla. 4th DCA August 12, 2016), we similarly reverse the final order of dismissal in the instant case and remand with instructions to reinstate the complaint. See Cheng v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., — So.3d-, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D1076 (Fla. 4th DCA May 4, 2016). Additionally, like in McKenna, we certify conflict with Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., — So.3d -, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D1376, 2016 WL 3191146 (Fla. 1st DCA June 9, 2016).

Reversed and remanded ivith instructions; conflict certified.

CIKLIN, C.J., LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Stavola, 198 So. 3d 1131, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12801, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1964 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

198 So. 3d 1131 (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Stavola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.
201 So. 3d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)