Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Larman

238 So. 3d 854
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 2018·No. No. 4D17–317·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons set forth in Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. McKenna , 198 So.3d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), we similarly reverse the final order of dismissal in the instant case and remand with instructions to reinstate the complaint. See Cheng v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. , 199 So.3d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

We certify conflict with Higgins v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc., 201 So.3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), as we did in McKenna .

Reversed and remanded with instructions; conflict certified.

Taylor, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Larman, 238 So. 3d 854 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

238 So. 3d 854 (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Larman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Cheng v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.
199 So. 3d 932 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.
201 So. 3d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. McKenna
198 So. 3d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)