DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. CLYDE LARMAN

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. CLYDE LARMAN

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 2018

Docket17-0317

StatusPublished

This text of DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. CLYDE LARMAN (DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. CLYDE LARMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. CLYDE LARMAN, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant,

v.

CLYDE LARMAN, Appellee.

No. 4D17-317

[March 14, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John Joseph Murphy, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE14- 009822 (21).

David M. Snyder of David M. Snyder, Tampa, and Susan B. Morrison of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Yanina Zilberman, Roy D. Oppenheim, Geoffrey E. Sherman and Jacquelyn Trask of Oppenheim & Pilelsky, Weston, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in Dyck–O'Neal, Inc. v. McKenna, 198 So. 3d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), we similarly reverse the final order of dismissal in the instant case and remand with instructions to reinstate the complaint. See Cheng v. Dyck–O'Neal, Inc., 199 So. 3d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

We certify conflict with Higgins v. Dyck–O'Neal, Inc., 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), as we did in McKenna.

Reversed and remanded with instructions; conflict certified.

TAYLOR, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI