Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Alice Cislo
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-2151 _____________________________
DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
ALICE CISLO,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County. Gregory S. Parker, Judge.
February 5, 2019
ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision in this case and remanded with instructions that we reconsider the matter in light of its decision in Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S278 (Fla. July 5, 2018). In compliance with the Florida Supreme Court's directive, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal order and remand this case for determination on the merits of Dyck-O’Neal’s deficiency claim.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Susan B. Morrison, of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., and David M. Snyder, of David M. Snyder, and Joshua D. Moore, of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.
James Dale Gibson, of Gibson, Kohl, Wolff & Hric, P.L., Sarasota, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Alice Cislo (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Alice Cislo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.