Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Alice Cislo

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2019·No. 17-2151·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-2151 _____________________________

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

ALICE CISLO,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County. Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

February 5, 2019

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision in this case and remanded with instructions that we reconsider the matter in light of its decision in Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S278 (Fla. July 5, 2018). In compliance with the Florida Supreme Court's directive, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal order and remand this case for determination on the merits of Dyck-O’Neal’s deficiency claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Susan B. Morrison, of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., and David M. Snyder, of David M. Snyder, and Joshua D. Moore, of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.

James Dale Gibson, of Gibson, Kohl, Wolff & Hric, P.L., Sarasota, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Alice Cislo, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Alice Cislo (Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Alice Cislo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.