Dyber v. Laurence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dyber v. Laurence

8 A.D.2d 820, 190 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8408

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 820 (Dyber v. Laurence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dyber v. Laurence, 8 A.D.2d 820, 190 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to restrain the conveyance, transfer or incumbrance of certain real property, and for other relief, the appeal is from an order which granted respondents’ motion to restore the action to the Equity Calendar and denied appellants’ cross motion for a jury trial of all the issues raised by the amended complaint and by the counterclaim of appellant Topsy’s Northern Blvd., Inc., for money damages against respondents, with leave, after the disposition of the equity causes of action herein, to apply for any necessary and proper directions with respect to the trial by jury of the said counterclaim. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to restrain the conveyance, transfer or incumbrance of certain real property, and for other relief, the appeal is from an order which granted respondents’ motion to restore the action to the Equity Calendar and denied appellants’ cross motion for a jury trial of all the issues raised by the amended complaint and by the counterclaim of appellant Topsy’s Northern Blvd., Inc., for money damages against respondents, with leave, after the disposition of the equity causes of action herein, to apply for any necessary and proper directions with respect to the trial by jury of the said counterclaim. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 820, 190 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyber-v-laurence-nyappdiv-1959.