D.Y. v. J.F.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals·Decided August 7, 2026·No. CAAP-26-0000089·Published

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 07-AUG-2026 07:53 AM Dkt. 43 ODSLJ

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

D.Y., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J.F., Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3FDV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Gluck, JJ.)

Upon review of the record in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and 3FDV-XX-XXXXXXX, it appears that: 1. Defendant-Appellant J.F. (J.F.) appeals from the January 8, 2026 "Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Sell Marital Real Properties to Fund Recovery of Subject Minor Child and Litigation Costs and for Other Relief, Filed Herein on December 4, 2025" (1/8/26 Order) entered in the Family Court of the Third Circuit (Family Court). 2. The court lacks jurisdiction over J.F.'s appeal because the Family Court has not entered a final, appealable decree, order, or judgment. See Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS) NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

§ 571-54 (2018); Eaton v. Eaton, 7 Haw. App. 111, 118-19, 748 P.2d 801, 805 (1987); Hamilton v. Hamilton, No. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, 2014 WL 2198378 (Haw. App. May 27, 2014) (Order). 3. The 1/8/26 Order was not authorized for interlocutory appeal pursuant to HRS § 641-1(b) (2016) and is not independently appealable. Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawaiʻi 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016). 4. The Forgay doctrine does not apply here. While the 1/8/26 Order called for the "immediate" sale of three of J.F.'s real properties, it did not designate a deadline to do so. Hamilton, 2014 WL 2198378, at *1. The 1/8/26 Order was not a final appealable order because the Family Court ordered that the sale proceeds be maintained in an escrow account and not disbursed without further order of the court. See Eaton, 7. Haw. App. at 120, 748 P.2d at 806-07. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 7, 2026. /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge

/s/ Daniel M. Gluck Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.Y. v. J.F., (hawapp 2026).

D.Y. v. J.F. (D.Y. v. J.F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eaton v. Eaton
748 P.2d 801 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1987)
Greer v. Baker.
369 P.3d 832 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2016)