Dwyer v. Polo Grounds Athletic Club Inc.

142 Misc. 465, 254 N.Y.S. 575, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 970
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 142 Misc. 465 (Dwyer v. Polo Grounds Athletic Club Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dwyer v. Polo Grounds Athletic Club Inc., 142 Misc. 465, 254 N.Y.S. 575, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 970 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1931).

Opinion

Rodenbeck, J.

There is no authority for changing the place of trial to Westchester county. Neither party resides there. The plaintiff resides in Ontario county, and the defendant is a corporation whose principal place of business is in New York county. The moving papers are defective in that they do not show what the proposed witnesses will testify to, so that the court is not able to say whether their testimony is material or not. (Dairymen’s League Co-Operative Assn., Inc., v. Brundo, 131 Misc. 548.)

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dairymen's League Co-Operative Ass'n v. Brundo
131 Misc. 548 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 Misc. 465, 254 N.Y.S. 575, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwyer-v-polo-grounds-athletic-club-inc-nysupct-1931.