Dwyer v. Madison Square Garden Corp.

235 A.D. 895

This text of 235 A.D. 895 (Dwyer v. Madison Square Garden Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dwyer v. Madison Square Garden Corp., 235 A.D. 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order reversed on the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide the event. Per Curiam. While it is true that the venue of an action will not ordinarily be changed from a rural to an urban county (Mills v. Sparrow, 131 App. Div. 241; Carvel Court Realty Co., Inc., v. Jonas, 195 id. 662), in this case there is added to the consideration of the greater number of defendant’s material witnesses the fact that the alleged contract sued upon was made and breached in New York county where plaintiff spent much of his time in business. (Veeldorano v. Union Ry. Co., 183 App. Div. 575; Woodland Lumber Co. v. Barnett, 185 id. 572; Broderick v. de Mesa, 178 id. 669; Parkhill v. New England Furniture & Carpet Co., 211 id. 871.) All concur, except Thompson, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mills v. Sparrow
131 A.D. 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Veeldorano v. Union Railway Co.
183 A.D. 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwyer-v-madison-square-garden-corp-nyappdiv-1932.