Dwyer v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
This text of 37 A.2d 88 (Dwyer v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Chief Justice Brogan, *486 reported in 131 N. J. L. 1, reserving, however, the question of liability udder the doctrine of the maritime law for maintenance and cure of the plaintiff as a seaman. The case was not decided by the jury on that theory, and it is not necessary to pass upon that phase of the case.
The judgment is affirmed.
For affirmance — Tiie Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Iíeher, Persiste, Porter, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 A.2d 88, 131 N.J.L. 485, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwyer-v-lehigh-valley-rr-co-nj-1944.