Dwyer v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Dwyer v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.

37 A.2d 88, 131 N.J.L. 485, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 216

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 13, 1944·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Chief Justice Brogan, *486 reported in 131 N. J. L. 1, reserving, however, the question of liability udder the doctrine of the maritime law for maintenance and cure of the plaintiff as a seaman. The case was not decided by the jury on that theory, and it is not necessary to pass upon that phase of the case.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — Tiie Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Iíeher, Persiste, Porter, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Chief Justice Brogan, *486 reported in 131 N. J. L. 1, reserving, however, the question of liability udder the doctrine of the maritime law for maintenance and cure of the plaintiff as a seaman. The case was not decided by the jury on that theory, and it is not necessary to pass upon that phase of the case.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — Tiie Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Iíeher, Persiste, Porter, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversed — None.

Dwyer v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co., 37 A.2d 88, 131 N.J.L. 485, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 216 (N.J. 1944).

Pincite

37 A.2d 88 (Dwyer v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.