Dwyer v. Bratkoysky

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Dwyer v. Bratkoysky

49 N.E. 915, 170 Mass. 502, 1898 Mass. LEXIS 261

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 21, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 49 N.E. 915 (Dwyer v. Bratkoysky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dwyer v. Bratkoysky, 49 N.E. 915, 170 Mass. 502, 1898 Mass. LEXIS 261 (Mass. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Field, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decree entered by a single justice, dismissing the bill, with costs. The evidence on which the case was heard has not been brought before us. The only papers before us are the pleadings, and the only question of law is whether such a decree properly could be entered under the pleadings. There are no such admissions of fact in the answer as would prevent the entering of such a decree. The decree therefore was warranted by the pleadings, and must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Field, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decree entered by a single justice, dismissing the bill, with costs. The evidence on which the case was heard has not been brought before us. The only papers before us are the pleadings, and the only question of law is whether such a decree properly could be entered under the pleadings. There are no such admissions of fact in the answer as would prevent the entering of such a decree. The decree therefore was warranted by the pleadings, and must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 N.E. 915, 170 Mass. 502, 1898 Mass. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwyer-v-bratkoysky-mass-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack