Dworman v. Carard Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dworman v. Carard Management Corp.

2017 NY Slip Op 3917, 150 A.D.3d 523, 52 N.Y.S.3d 225

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 2017

Docket651802/16

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3917 (Dworman v. Carard Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dworman v. Carard Management Corp., 2017 NY Slip Op 3917, 150 A.D.3d 523, 52 N.Y.S.3d 225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered January 30, 2017, which denied defendants Carard Management Corp. and Dean Palin’s motion to stay the action pending arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*524 The arbitration demands, which identify the issues to be arbitrated, and the claims asserted in the complaint are not “inextricably intertwined]” so as to warrant staying the judicial proceeding lest the resolution of the arbitrable issues narrow or resolve the non-arbitrable issues (see County Glass & Metal Installers, Inc. v Pavarini McGovern, LLC, 65 AD3d 940, 940 [1st Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Moreover, no defendant in this action is a party to the arbitration.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered January 30, 2017, which denied defendants Carard Management Corp. and Dean Palin’s motion to stay the action pending arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*524 The arbitration demands, which identify the issues to be arbitrated, and the claims asserted in the complaint are not “inextricably intertwined]” so as to warrant staying the judicial proceeding lest the resolution of the arbitrable issues narrow or resolve the non-arbitrable issues (see County Glass & Metal Installers, Inc. v Pavarini McGovern, LLC, 65 AD3d 940, 940 [1st Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Moreover, no defendant in this action is a party to the arbitration.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 3917, 150 A.D.3d 523, 52 N.Y.S.3d 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dworman-v-carard-management-corp-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack