Dworman v. Carard Management Corp.

2017 NY Slip Op 3917, 150 A.D.3d 523, 52 N.Y.S.3d 225
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 2017·No. 651802/16·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered January 30, 2017, which denied defendants Carard Management Corp. and Dean Palin’s motion to stay the action pending arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*524 The arbitration demands, which identify the issues to be arbitrated, and the claims asserted in the complaint are not “inextricably intertwined]” so as to warrant staying the judicial proceeding lest the resolution of the arbitrable issues narrow or resolve the non-arbitrable issues (see County Glass & Metal Installers, Inc. v Pavarini McGovern, LLC, 65 AD3d 940, 940 [1st Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Moreover, no defendant in this action is a party to the arbitration.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dworman v. Carard Management Corp., 2017 NY Slip Op 3917, 150 A.D.3d 523, 52 N.Y.S.3d 225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 3917 (Dworman v. Carard Management Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County Glass & Metal Installers, Inc. v. Pavarini McGovern, LLC
65 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)