Dwork v. Cohen

13 Misc. 2d 676, 106 N.Y.S.2d 657
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided June 22, 1950·Published

Opinion

Frank A. Carlin, J.

Plaintiff’s motion for an order seeking leave to issue execution against the person of the defendant herein is denied in the discretion of the court under section 764 of the Civil Practice Act, as well as on the ground that the complaint herein is predicated on causes of action in contract and tort which preclude the relief sought as it cannot be granted unless authorized by each cause of action. (Boyle v. Semenoff, 201 App. Div. 426; Miller v. Scherder, 2 N. Y. 262; Woods v. Armstrong, 29 Misc. 660; B. I. P. [Export] v. Isaacs, 10 F. Supp. 872; 5 Carmody, N. Y. Practice, § 1689.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dwork v. Cohen, 13 Misc. 2d 676, 106 N.Y.S.2d 657 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1950).

13 Misc. 2d 676 (Dwork v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller & Becker v. Scherder
2 N.Y. 262 (New York Court of Appeals, 1849)
Boyle v. Semenoff
201 A.D. 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Woods v. Armstrong
29 Misc. 660 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)
B. I. P. (Export), Ltd. v. Isaacs
10 F. Supp. 872 (S.D. New York, 1935)