Dwight v. Fancher

156 N.E. 186, 245 N.Y. 71, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 591
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 29, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by48 cases

This text of 156 N.E. 186 (Dwight v. Fancher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dwight v. Fancher, 156 N.E. 186, 245 N.Y. 71, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 591 (N.Y. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Evidence of extrinsic circumstances may sometimes assist the court in the construction of language which a testator has used to express his testamentary intention; but here the language of the will, even when read in the light of extrinsic circumstances, admits of but one construction. Parol evidence is not admissible to show that the testatrix did not mean what she has said in words, though these words may have been chosen by the attorney who drafted the will rather than by the testatrix. (Reynolds v. Robinson, 82 N. Y. 103.) We do not pass upon the question of whether the attorney was a competent witness in this action. (Civ. Prac. Act, secs. 353, 354.) The evidence would not be admissible though given by a witness who was competent.

The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Scale
38 A.D.3d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re the Estate of Campbell
171 Misc. 2d 892 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1997)
In re the Estate of Annesley
97 Misc. 2d 1047 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1979)
In re the Estate of Rothko
77 Misc. 2d 168 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1974)
In re the Estate of Hamilton
69 Misc. 2d 246 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1972)
In re the Estate of Skidell
25 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
In re the Estate of Johnson
41 Misc. 2d 314 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1963)
In re the Estate of Devine
41 Misc. 2d 211 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1963)
In re the Estate of Braun
36 Misc. 2d 692 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1962)
In re the Final Accounting of Sangnier
28 Misc. 2d 992 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1961)
In re the Estate of Athanasiou
24 Misc. 2d 12 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
In re the Construction of the Will of Rosman
19 Misc. 2d 881 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1959)
In re the Construction of the Will of Searle
13 Misc. 2d 912 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1958)
In re the Construction of the Will of Salterini
7 Misc. 2d 497 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
In re the Intermediate Accounting of Bankers Trust Co.
6 Misc. 2d 920 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
In re the Construction of Will of Hogan
24 Misc. 2d 449 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1954)
Estate of Blackbourn v. Brinkman
49 N.W.2d 755 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1951)
In re the Estate of Ittleson
197 Misc. 786 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1950)
In re the Construction of the Will of Mallouk
195 Misc. 996 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
Clark v. Tibbetts
167 F.2d 397 (Second Circuit, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.E. 186, 245 N.Y. 71, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwight-v-fancher-ny-1927.