Dwight v. Cuneo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dwight v. Cuneo

174 A.D. 918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.D. 918 (Dwight v. Cuneo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dwight v. Cuneo, 174 A.D. 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified by striking from the same the following clause, viz.: “ Adjudged and Decreed, that this action be and the same hereby is dismissed, on the merits as to the defendants Joan Newton Cuneo and Atlantic Macaroni Company,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Such modification is made upon the ground that for the relief granted to the plaintiff by the judgment the said defendants are proper and necessary parties to the action. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by striking from the same the following clause, viz.: “ Adjudged and Decreed, that this action be and the same hereby is dismissed, on the merits as to the defendants Joan Newton Cuneo and Atlantic Macaroni Company,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Such modification is made upon the ground that for the relief granted to the plaintiff by the judgment the said defendants are proper and necessary parties to the action. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwight-v-cuneo-nyappdiv-1916.