Dwight v. Commissioner
This text of 1988 T.C. Memo. 100 (Dwight v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
GOLDBERG,
*129 Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income taxes for the taxable years 1980 and 1981 in the amounts of $ 395 and $ 318, respectively. Respondent also determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax for 1981 under section 6653(a)(1) in the amount of $ 15.90, and section 6653(a)(2) in an amount equal to 50 percent of the interest due on the underpayment of $ 318. Further, at trial, respondent orally moved for an award of damages pursuant to section 6673 in the amount of $ 5,000. After concessions by respondent, the issues for decision are: (1) whether respondent correctly disallowed a credit claimed by petitioner on her 1981 return based upon her opposition to military expenditures by the Federal government; (2) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax for 1981 under section 6653(a); and (3) whether damages should be awarded under section 6673.
Petitioner resided in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina when she filed her petition. She timely filed her U.S. Individual Income Tax Returns for 1980 and 1981. On line 27 of her 1981 Federal income tax return, petitioner computed her income tax to be $ 653. On line 46 of the return, she claimed a*130 war tax protest credit of 50 percent, or $ 326.50 of the computed tax, thereby reducing her reported tax liability by one-half.
Petitioner contends that she is connscientiously opposed to providing funds for military purposes and for this reason, as well as the dictates of her religious belief, she is unwilling to pay a tax which is used for military purposes. Petitioner graduated from Winthrop College in Rock Hill, South Carolina. She pursued graduate studies at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, Western North Carolina University, Cullowhie, North Carolina, and St. Luke's Seminary at the University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee. Petitioner is a highly educated person who sincerely believes the moral correctness of her views.
At the outset, we have no doubt as to the sincerity of petitioner's convictions. However, there is no merit in petitioner's contentions. It is a fundamental principle of tax law that a taxpayer has no right to reduce her Federal tax liability on the ground that governmental policies or expenditures conflict with her religious or moral convictions, no matter how sincerely those convictions may be held. The courts have repeatedly upheld*131 this principle, regardless of whether the taxpayer's claim is based upon constitutional rights or is founded upon a particular ethical, humanitarian, or religious belief.
Respondent's determination that petitioner is liable for the additions to tax provided by section 6653(a) is presumed correct and petitioner has the burden of proving that the determination is erroneous.
Finally, we must decide whether to award damages to the United States under section 6673.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1988 T.C. Memo. 100, 55 T.C.M. 358, 1988 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwight-v-commissioner-tax-1988.