Dwight v. Acme Lumber & Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Dwight v. Acme Lumber & Supply Co.

199 S.E. 178, 186 Ga. 825, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 715

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 27, 1938

DocketNo. 12406

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 199 S.E. 178 (Dwight v. Acme Lumber & Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dwight v. Acme Lumber & Supply Co., 199 S.E. 178, 186 Ga. 825, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 715 (Ga. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

1. ‘“A bona fide purchaser of the absolute title of real estate, who bought without notice of a materialman’s lien upon the same, which at the time of the purchase had been neither recorded nor foreclosed, took the property divested of such lien.’ Ashmore v. Whatley, 99 Ga. 150 (24 S. E. 941).” Willingham-Tift Lumber Co. v. Barnes, 147 Ga. 209 (2) (93 S. E. 201).

2. Where a materialman furnished to an owner of real estate lumber and material to be used in the construction of a house thereon, and after the completion of the house, but within three months from the date some of the material used in the construction was so furnished, recorded his claim of lien; and where within twelve months after his claim became due he instituted suit to foreclose his lien, obtained a judgment declaring it to be a special lien on the property so improved, and an execution thereon was issued and levied on the property, and a third party to whom a deed thereto from the owner was made and recorded after the completion of the house but two days before the material-man’s claim of lien was recorded, filed a claim, it was error for the court to direct the jury to return a verdict finding the property subject, in the absence of any attack on the deed of the claimant.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. W. E. & W. G. Mann, for plaintiff in error. Garitón G. McCamy, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

1. ‘“A bona fide purchaser of the absolute title of real estate, who bought without notice of a materialman’s lien upon the same, which at the time of the purchase had been neither recorded nor foreclosed, took the property divested of such lien.’ Ashmore v. Whatley, 99 Ga. 150 (24 S. E. 941).” Willingham-Tift Lumber Co. v. Barnes, 147 Ga. 209 (2) (93 S. E. 201).

2. Where a materialman furnished to an owner of real estate lumber and material to be used in the construction of a house thereon, and after the completion of the house, but within three months from the date some of the material used in the construction was so furnished, recorded his claim of lien; and where within twelve months after his claim became due he instituted suit to foreclose his lien, obtained a judgment declaring it to be a special lien on the property so improved, and an execution thereon was issued and levied on the property, and a third party to whom a deed thereto from the owner was made and recorded after the completion of the house but two days before the material-man’s claim of lien was recorded, filed a claim, it was error for the court to direct the jury to return a verdict finding the property subject, in the absence of any attack on the deed of the claimant.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. W. E. & W. G. Mann, for plaintiff in error. Garitón G. McCamy, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 S.E. 178, 186 Ga. 825, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwight-v-acme-lumber-supply-co-ga-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack