Dwight Pulley v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.
Opinion
Dwight Pulley appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. 2 We find no valid basis — and Pulley offers none — for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned decision. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
. We decline to consider the claims Pulley has waived on appeal, see Marksmeier v. Davie, 622 F.3d 896, 902 n. 4 (8th Cir.2010), as well as the allegations, claims, and exhibits he offers for the first time on appeal, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir.2004) (new allegations and claims); Griffin v. Super Valu, 218 F.3d 869, 871 (8th Cir.2000) (new documents).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
549 F. App'x 591 (Dwight Pulley v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.