Dwight Pulley v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.

549 F. App'x 591
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2013·No. 13-2118·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dwight Pulley appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. 2 We find no valid basis — and Pulley offers none — for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned decision. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

2

. We decline to consider the claims Pulley has waived on appeal, see Marksmeier v. Davie, 622 F.3d 896, 902 n. 4 (8th Cir.2010), as well as the allegations, claims, and exhibits he offers for the first time on appeal, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir.2004) (new allegations and claims); Griffin v. Super Valu, 218 F.3d 869, 871 (8th Cir.2000) (new documents).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dwight Pulley v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., 549 F. App'x 591 (8th Cir. 2013).

549 F. App'x 591 (Dwight Pulley v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related