Dwight Lindquist v. City Meat Market
This text of Dwight Lindquist v. City Meat Market (Dwight Lindquist v. City Meat Market) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 98-6020MN _____________
In re: * * Jerry Clark Vincent, * * Debtor. * * Appeal from the United States Dwight R.J. Lindquist, Trustee, * Bankruptcy Court for the * District of Minnesota Plaintiff - Appellee, * * [UNPUBLISHED] v. * * City Meat Market of St. Paul, Inc., * * Defendant - Appellant. *
Submitted: March 17, 1998 Filed: March 20, 1998 _____________
Before KOGER, Chief Judge, WILLIAM A. HILL, and SCHERMER, Bankruptcy Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
The defendant-appellant, City Meat Market of St. Paul, Inc. (“CMM”), and the plaintiff-appellee, Dwight R.J. Lindquist (“trustee”), were parties to an adversary proceeding before the bankruptcy court. On March 3, 1998, CMM filed a notice of appeal from the following orders of the bankruptcy court, which were entered in connection with the adversary proceeding: (1) an order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the trustee, entered January 7, 1998; (2) orders denying CMM’s objection, and granting trustee’s motion, to dismiss count one of the trustee’s complaint, entered February 19, 1998; and (3) a judgment in favor of trustee against CMM in the amount of $32,429.03, entered February 19, 1998.
Pursuant to Rule 8002(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, “[t]he notice of appeal shall be filed with the clerk within 10 days of the date of the entry of the judgment, order, or decree appealed from.” Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a). CMM filed its notice of appeal outside the ten day period provided for in the rule. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(a). Additionally, CMM has not made a request for an extension of time to appeal the rulings of the bankruptcy court pursuant to Rule 8002(c).
Thus, CMM has failed to timely file its notice of appeal. Its failure deprives us of jurisdiction to entertain its appeals, which must therefore be dismissed. See Veltman v. Whetzal, 93 F.3d 517, 520-21 (8th Cir. 1996); Jacobson v. Nielsen, 932 F.2d 1272-73 (8th Cir. 1991); accord Solomon v. Smith (In re Moody), 41 F.3d 1024, 1026-27 (5th Cir. 1995); see also In re Morrilton Plastics Prods., Inc., 177 B.R. 622, 624 n.4 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1995).
Accordingly, CMM’s appeals from the bankruptcy court are DISMISSED.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dwight Lindquist v. City Meat Market, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwight-lindquist-v-city-meat-market-bap8-1998.