Dwight Alexander v. Bayview Loan Servicing

437 F. App'x 525
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 2011
Docket11-1615
StatusUnpublished

This text of 437 F. App'x 525 (Dwight Alexander v. Bayview Loan Servicing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dwight Alexander v. Bayview Loan Servicing, 437 F. App'x 525 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dwight Alexander appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his civil action. Because Alexander’s timely motions to vacate remain pending in the district court, his notice of appeal is not yet effective. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(i). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to appellant’s timely filing of a new notice of appeal after the district court rules on his pending motions. See Parkus v. Delo, 985 F.2d 425, 426 (8th Cir.1993). We deny as moot Alexander’s motion to supplement the record on appeal.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steven Parkus v. Paul K. Delo
985 F.2d 425 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 F. App'x 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwight-alexander-v-bayview-loan-servicing-ca8-2011.