Dwight Alexander v. Bayview Loan Servicing

437 F. App'x 525
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dwight Alexander v. Bayview Loan Servicing. Read the opinion of the Court — 511 F. App'x 589
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 16, 2011·No. 11-1615·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dwight Alexander appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his civil action. Because Alexander’s timely motions to vacate remain pending in the district court, his notice of appeal is not yet effective. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(i). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to appellant’s timely filing of a new notice of appeal after the district court rules on his pending motions. See Parkus v. Delo, 985 F.2d 425, 426 (8th Cir.1993). We deny as moot Alexander’s motion to supplement the record on appeal.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dwight Alexander v. Bayview Loan Servicing, 437 F. App'x 525 (8th Cir. 2011).

437 F. App'x 525 (Dwight Alexander v. Bayview Loan Servicing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steven Parkus v. Paul K. Delo
985 F.2d 425 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)