Dwiggins v. Robertsons.

Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity

Dwiggins v. Robertsons.

1 Tenn. 81

CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity

DecidedSeptember 6, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tenn. 81 (Dwiggins v. Robertsons.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dwiggins v. Robertsons., 1 Tenn. 81 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

White, Judge

—The practice uniformly has been to consider the ground or reasons for granting a certiorari, as open to investigation, during the next succeeding term after granting it, whether granted within or out of court.

Consequently the propriety of granting it may be examined during the next term.

Trimble, then stated that the petition was sworn to by one of the defendants only.—The order however was not reversed on that objection.

Campbell, j. and Overton, j.—Accorded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White, Judge

—The practice uniformly has been to consider the ground or reasons for granting a certiorari, as open to investigation, during the next succeeding term after granting it, whether granted within or out of court.

Consequently the propriety of granting it may be examined during the next term.

Trimble, then stated that the petition was sworn to by one of the defendants only.—The order however was not reversed on that objection.

Campbell, j. and Overton, j.—Accorded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Tenn. 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwiggins-v-robertsons-tennsuperct-1804.