Dwiggins v. McLeod

Supreme Court of Florida

Dwiggins v. McLeod

168 So. 401, 124 Fla. 333, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1122

DecidedMay 22, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 401 (Dwiggins v. McLeod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dwiggins v. McLeod, 168 So. 401, 124 Fla. 333, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1122 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

*334 Pee Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree sustaining a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint filed by the appellant in the court below. After consideration of the transcript of the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the decree appealed from should be reversed, while Mr. Presiding Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that said decree should be affirmed. The members of the court being equally divided in opinion as to whether or not said decree should be reversed, the result is that under the familiar doctrine of Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. 51, the decree appealed from must be and is hereby

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*334 Pee Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree sustaining a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint filed by the appellant in the court below. After consideration of the transcript of the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the decree appealed from should be reversed, while Mr. Presiding Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that said decree should be affirmed. The members of the court being equally divided in opinion as to whether or not said decree should be reversed, the result is that under the familiar doctrine of Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. 51, the decree appealed from must be and is hereby

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 So. 401, 124 Fla. 333, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwiggins-v-mcleod-fla-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack