Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson v. Sterling Shire Apartments

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 25, 2018
Docket01-17-00785-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson v. Sterling Shire Apartments (Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson v. Sterling Shire Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson v. Sterling Shire Apartments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson v. Sterling Shire Apartments

Appellate case number: 01-17-00785-CV

Trial court case number: 1098747

Trial court: Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Appellant, Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final judgment in a forcible detainer action brought by appellee, Sterling Shire Apartments. In his notice of appeal, appellant named Sterling Shire, its attorney, Duke Amos, and the Honorable Robert Lloyd, presiding judge of Harris County Civil Court of Law No. 4, as appellees. An appellee, however, must be a party to the trial court’s final judgment and someone against whom the appellant raises issues or points of error in the appellant’s brief. See Gray v. Allen, 41 S.W.3d 330, 331 n.2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, no pet.); see also Showbiz Multimedia, LLC v. Mountain States Mortg. Ctrs., Inc., 303 S.W.3d 769, 771 n.3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, no pet.). Although appellant raises issues against them in his brief, neither Amos nor Judge Lloyd are parties to the final judgment in the underlying case. Therefore, Amos and Judge Lloyd are not “appellees” or otherwise parties to this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss as moot (1) “Putative Appellees the Honorable Roberta Lloyd-County Court at Law No. 4’s Opposed Motion to Dismiss,” (2) “Putative Appellees the Honorable Roberta Lloyd-County Court at Law No. 4’s Opposed Motion to Stay Briefing Deadline,” and (3) Amos’s “Co-Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss.”

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: January 25, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Showbiz Multimedia, LLC v. Mountain States Mortgage Centers, Inc.
303 S.W.3d 769 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Gray v. Allen
41 S.W.3d 330 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson v. Sterling Shire Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwayne-rayshaun-wilson-v-sterling-shire-apartments-texapp-2018.