Dwayne Johnson v. State of Florida
This text of Dwayne Johnson v. State of Florida (Dwayne Johnson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2023-1929 Lower Tribunal No. 2000-CF-001452-AXXX-XX _____________________________
DWAYNE JOHNSON,
Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal pursuant to Fla. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County. Elizabeth V. Krier, Judge.
November 27, 2024
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne Johnson appeals an order denying his motion for continuance,
accepting the notice of voluntary withdrawal of his motion for postconviction relief
under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and dismissing his motion for
postconviction relief with prejudice. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.030(b)(1)(A), 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Under Clark v. State, 491 So. 2d 545, 546 (Fla. 1986), Johnson was entitled
to withdraw his rule 3.850 motion while it was pending when there would be no
prejudice to the State. See Simon v. State, 768 So. 2d 1089, 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The sole issue before us is whether the postconviction court properly
dismissed Johnson’s rule 3.850 petition with prejudice. “A typical postconviction
motion should not be dismissed with prejudice when the defendant volunteers to
dismiss it unless there is prejudice to the State or some justification for resolving the
motion on the merits.” McCray v. State, 104 So. 3d 1201, 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012);
see also Hutchinson v. State, 921 So. 2d 780, 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
The State concedes that it will not suffer prejudice if the petition is dismissed
without prejudice and, therefore, concedes error. The motion for postconviction
relief should have been dismissed without prejudice, and we remand for entry of
such an order.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
STARGEL, NARDELLA and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.
Michelle R. Walsh, of Law Offices of Michelle R. Walsh, P.A., Coral Gables, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Taylor A. Schell and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistants Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dwayne Johnson v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwayne-johnson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.