Dwayne James Weakley and Beatriz Weakley v. Michael Schukar; Ellen Schukar; Shaun Siems; Suzanne Siems; Morgan Morita; Lisa Morita; John Hammett; Lee Hammett; Chandy Verghese; Leena Verghese; And Grayson Lee
This text of Dwayne James Weakley and Beatriz Weakley v. Michael Schukar; Ellen Schukar; Shaun Siems; Suzanne Siems; Morgan Morita; Lisa Morita; John Hammett; Lee Hammett; Chandy Verghese; Leena Verghese; And Grayson Lee (Dwayne James Weakley and Beatriz Weakley v. Michael Schukar; Ellen Schukar; Shaun Siems; Suzanne Siems; Morgan Morita; Lisa Morita; John Hammett; Lee Hammett; Chandy Verghese; Leena Verghese; And Grayson Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00173-CV
Dwayne James Weakley and Beatriz Weakley, Appellants
v.
Michael Schukar, Ellen Schukar, Shaun Siems, Suzanne Siems, Morgan Morita, Lisa Morita, John Hammett, Lee Hammett, Chandy Verghese, Leena Verghese, and Grayson Lee, Appellees
FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 423-7138, THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on March 20,
2026. On March 20, 2026, we notified appellants that no clerk’s record had been filed due to
their failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s
record. The notice requested that appellants make arrangements for the clerk’s record and
submit a status report regarding this appeal by March 30, 2026. Further, the notice advised
appellants that their failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal
for want of prosecution. To date, appellants have not filed a status report or otherwise responded
to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.
If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to
pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed
without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellants have not established
that they are entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because
appellants have failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the
clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
__________________________________________ Karin Crump, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: April 3, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dwayne James Weakley and Beatriz Weakley v. Michael Schukar; Ellen Schukar; Shaun Siems; Suzanne Siems; Morgan Morita; Lisa Morita; John Hammett; Lee Hammett; Chandy Verghese; Leena Verghese; And Grayson Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dwayne-james-weakley-and-beatriz-weakley-v-michael-schukar-ellen-schukar-txctapp3-2026.