D.W. v. State

78 So. 3d 104, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1083
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 2012
DocketNo. 1D11-1873
StatusPublished

This text of 78 So. 3d 104 (D.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.W. v. State, 78 So. 3d 104, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1083 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Brockman, 827 So.2d 299, 302 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“In resisting a judgment of acquittal, the state can rely on any evidence adduced, even evidence later determined to have been erroneously admitted.”).

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brockman
827 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 So. 3d 104, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dw-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.