DVI Receivables XIV v. Rosenberg (In Re Rosenberg)

472 F. App'x 890
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 2012
Docket11-14823
StatusUnpublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 472 F. App'x 890 (DVI Receivables XIV v. Rosenberg (In Re Rosenberg)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DVI Receivables XIV v. Rosenberg (In Re Rosenberg), 472 F. App'x 890 (11th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-Appellants were the petitioning creditors before the bankruptcy court, and they brought an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, as amended, against Maury Rosenberg as debtor. After an evidentiary hearing and exhaustive briefing, the bankruptcy court granted Rosenberg’s motion to dismiss the involuntary bankruptcy case, concluding that the Plaintiff-Appellants were not real parties in interest for numerous reasons (including having no financial interest in the case) and thus lacked standing to pursue the asserted claims as petitioning creditors.

In its order filed on September 28, 2011, the district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of the involuntary petition with prejudice. Athough the district court disagreed with one of the reasons given by the bankruptcy court for the dismissal, the district court agreed with all of the other findings and grounds for dismissal outlined in the bankruptcy court’s 34-page order, which the district court commended as “well-reasoned.”

After careful review, we conclude that the Plaintiff-Appellants have not shown reversible error in the district court’s Sep *891 tember 28, 2011 order. The district court’s judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F. App'x 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dvi-receivables-xiv-v-rosenberg-in-re-rosenberg-ca11-2012.