Duzant v. Duzant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Duzant v. Duzant

91 A.D.2d 986, 458 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16289

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.2d 986 (Duzant v. Duzant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duzant v. Duzant, 91 A.D.2d 986, 458 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16289 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for divorce, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rodell, J.), dated January 6,1982, which denied her motion to vacate a prior order of the same court that had, inter alia, set aside an order granted her temporary child support of $100 per week. Order modified so as to grant the plaintiff’s motion to the extent of awarding her $35 per week as temporary [987]*987child support. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. The parties concede, and we agree, that plaintiff should have been awarded temporary child support in the sum of $35 per week. Mollen, P. J., Weinstein, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for divorce, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rodell, J.), dated January 6,1982, which denied her motion to vacate a prior order of the same court that had, inter alia, set aside an order granted her temporary child support of $100 per week. Order modified so as to grant the plaintiff’s motion to the extent of awarding her $35 per week as temporary [987]*987child support. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. The parties concede, and we agree, that plaintiff should have been awarded temporary child support in the sum of $35 per week. Mollen, P. J., Weinstein, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 986, 458 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duzant-v-duzant-nyappdiv-1983.