DUX Petroleum, LLC v. ERW Trading & Transportation, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 29, 2015·No. 02-14-00325-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00325-CV

DUX PETROLEUM, LLC APPELLANT

V.

ERW TRADING & APPELLEE TRANSPORTATION, LLC

------------

FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 153-270478-14

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Reverse And Set

Aside Trial Court Judgment Without Regard To The Merits And Remand For

Disposition In Accord With Agreement Of The Parties, And For Immediate

Issuance Of Mandate.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. granted; therefore, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the

merits and remand this case to the trial court to render judgment in accordance

with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office

Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).Costs of the appeal

shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J.

DELIVERED: January 29, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUX Petroleum, LLC v. ERW Trading & Transportation, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

DUX Petroleum, LLC v. ERW Trading & Transportation, LLC (DUX Petroleum, LLC v. ERW Trading & Transportation, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Innovative Office System, Inc. v. Johnson
911 S.W.2d 387 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)