Duvall v. National Links Trust
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
VERNEL DUVALL,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 25-1034 (TJK)
NATIONAL LINKS TRUST,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM
In early April 2025, Defendant removed this case from D.C. Superior Court. On April 14,
Defendant moved to dismiss. The next day, the Court entered a Fox Order ordering Plaintiff to
respond by April 29, 2025, and if not, advising him that the Court may treat Defendant’s motion
as conceded and dismiss the case. A copy of that order was sent to Plaintiff’s address of record.
When the deadline passed with no response from Plaintiff, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show
cause by May 19, 2025, why it should not treat Defendant’s motion as conceded. See Min. Order
of May 5, 2025. The docket reflects no response from Plaintiff to that order either. Indeed, Plain-
tiff has filed nothing on the docket since the case was removed. For these reasons, pursuant to
Local Rule 83.23 and the Court’s “inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for a plaintiff’s
failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with a court order,” Peterson v. Archstone Communities
LLC, 637 F.3d 416, 418 (D.C. Cir. 2011), the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. A
separate order will issue.
/s/ Timothy J. Kelly _____ TIMOTHY J. KELLY United States District Judge Date: June 2, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duvall v. National Links Trust (Duvall v. National Links Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.