Duvall v. Koster

318 S.W.3d 320, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1071, 2010 WL 3314779
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 24, 2010·No. ED 94195·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John C. Duvall (“Duvall”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his complaint against the Office of the Missouri Attorney General (“the Attorney General”). Duvall sets forth eight points concerning whether he had standing and whether the trial court had jurisdiction regarding his claims that the Attorney General violated the law in his investigation and prosecution of crimes.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the *321 reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duvall v. Koster, 318 S.W.3d 320, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1071, 2010 WL 3314779 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

318 S.W.3d 320 (Duvall v. Koster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.