Duvall v. Griffith
2 H. & G. 30
Opinion
The court are of opinion, that the testimony objected to by the defendant in the court below, was admissible for the purpose of showing the malice of the defendant in speaking the words laid in the declaration; and if admissible for any purpose, the court below were right in permitting the evidence to go to the jury.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duvall v. Griffith, 2 H. & G. 30 (Md. 1827).
2 H. & G. 30 (Duvall v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garrett v. Dickerson
19 Md. 418 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1863)
Dorsey v. Whipps
8 Gill 457 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1849)