Duval v. Palmer

34 A.2d 319, 113 Vt. 392, 1943 Vt. LEXIS 190
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duval v. Palmer. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 Vt. 389
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided November 2, 1943·Published

Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

This is an action of negligence in which the plaintiff seeks to recover for damages resulting to him because of injuries sustained by his minor son when hit and injured by an automobile owned and driven by the defendant in the city of Burlington on January 19, 1942. The case was tried below with Thomas Duval, b. n. f., Paul Duval, v. Palmer, and presents the same questions as the latter. The opinion in that case has been handed down at the present term of this court, 113 Vt 389, 34 A2d 317. For the reasons there stated the entry in this case is : Judgment reversed. Judgment for the defendant to recover her costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duval v. Palmer, 34 A.2d 319, 113 Vt. 392, 1943 Vt. LEXIS 190 (Vt. 1943).

34 A.2d 319 (Duval v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duval v. Palmer
34 A.2d 317 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1943)